adidas Adizero Electric+ II

Built for Players who rely on speed (wide receivers, defensive backs, running backs).

adidas Adizero Electric+ II
Cleats Hub ScoreProvisional
6.9
/10
Provisional
Confidence: low · 4 reviews
⚠ Provisional score. Built from just 4 reviews, so confidence is low. This score may not be accurate yet and we don't fully rank it against thoroughly-reviewed cleats. Treat it as an early signal, not a verdict, we update it as more reviews land.
4 critic · 0 owner · Critic 6.9 · Owner · we don't sell or test products.
See the full breakdown ↓

A featherweight speed cleat with elite traction and secure lockdown, offset by limited cushioning and mixed durability.

Very light for accelerationStrong grip for sharp cutsSecure heel lockdownLow-cut speed profile

Key specs

QUICK DATA
Released2025BrandAdidas
Modeladidas Adizero Electric+ IITypeAmerican Football · Cleat
LevelEliteUpperSynthetic / Textile upper
SoleplateSprintframe 2.0 / performance TPU plate with shaped studs (adidas description: data-driven traction / precision-shaped studs)SurfaceFootball / Multi-ground (firm ground / multi-ground use listed by adidas)
Who it's forPlayers who rely on speed (wide receivers, defensive backs, running backs)Weight221 g
FitTrue to sizeMSRP$180

The verdict

01 / REVIEW

Synthesised from 4 independent reviews, every claim traces to a quote in the breakdown. We don't test products ourselves.

The adidas Adizero Electric+ II is a low-cut, elite-level American-football cleat that weighs 221 g and uses a Sprintframe 2.0 performance TPU plate with shaped studs for traction. Reviewers agree it delivers very strong grip and helps with quick acceleration. The main trade-offs are limited cushioning, a thin upper, and mixed durability.

Design and build

Released in 2025 as an elite-tier, low-cut speed cleat, the adidas Adizero Electric+ II is the second generation of the Adizero Electric line; the first Adizero Electric launched in 2024.

The upper is a synthetic/textile construction. The shoe is listed as fitting true to size and is positioned for players who rely on speed (wide receivers, defensive backs, running backs).

The sole uses adidas' Sprintframe 2.0: a performance TPU plate with shaped, data-driven studs described by adidas for precision traction. The plate and shaped studs are specified for football multi-ground/firm-ground use.

Weight is 221 g per shoe and the stated MSRP is $180.

On the field
On the field

Who it's for

The Adizero Electric+ II is aimed at low-cut speed skill players: wide receivers, cornerbacks, running backs and safeties who prioritise acceleration, change-of-direction and ground bite. Its 221 g weight, Sprintframe 2.0 plate and shaped studs suit firm-ground and multi-ground play for athletes who accept a minimal, fast-feeling shoe.

Players who need extra ankle support, heavier cushioning for long practices, or the reinforced construction preferred by linemen and power positions should look to mid- or high-cut alternatives. Those with wide feet should note the generally snug fit and consider trying a half size up or testing fit in person.

Weight

Reviewers across four outlets describe the Adizero Electric+ II as notably light, and the published weight is 221 g per shoe. That lightness is linked in reviews to quicker acceleration and a track-spike feel.

Support: ShoesTrace called it 'Lightweight construction for faster movement.', FootballRS said 'These cleats are ridiculously light,' and Hunter Reynolds described them as feeling 'like a track spike on your foot.'

Traction

Traction is the cleat's most consistent strength in reviews: testers report aggressive, confidence-inspiring grip that helps on quick maneuvers and sharp cuts.

Support: ShoesTrace rated traction highly with 'Exceptional grip that boosts confidence on quick maneuvers,' Cleats Report called it 'Aggressive traction for quick sprints and sharp cuts,' and Hunter Reynolds noted he 'felt like my foot was in the ground' during cuts.

'the grip, it’s absolutely insane.'. FootballRS

Lockdown

Most reviewers describe secure heel and midfoot lockdown driven by a contoured heel cup and snug synthetic upper, which contributes to on-field stability during cuts.

Support: ShoesTrace pointed to 'exceptional lockdown for agility,' Cleats Report said 'Heel lockdown is firm without being overly restrictive,' and FootballRS described a molded heel cup that 'wrapped around my foot beautifully.'

Outsole & studs
Outsole & studs

Fit

Fit is generally reported as true to size but snug. One reviewer sized down successfully, and another described the fit simply as 'snug,' indicating players with specific sizing habits may want to try both their usual size and a half-size adjustment.

Support: ShoesTrace and Cleats Report say they run true to size, FootballRS opted to size down, and Hunter Reynolds called them 'a snug fit.'

Support

Assessments of structural support are mixed: some testers find midfoot and heel lockdown sufficient, while at least one reviewer called the upper 'so thin and minimal' that it provides limited foot support.

Support: Cleats Report and ShoesTrace noted a locked-in midfoot and adequate support, whereas FootballRS rated support low and described the upper as minimal; Hunter Reynolds cautioned against them for players with weak ankles.

Planting to cut
Planting to cut

Comfort

Comfort is a trade-off with the speed-focused construction: reviewers commonly note the minimal cushioning favors responsiveness over all-day comfort, and extended sessions (beyond about two hours) can highlight the lack of padding.

Support: ShoesTrace said they are engineered for performance rather than all-day comfort, FootballRS warned the 'lack of cushioning' becomes noticeable after two hours, while Hunter Reynolds gave a higher comfort score.

Value

Reviewers are split on value. Some see the combination of light weight and elite traction as justifying a premium, while others point to the price as a potential barrier given the cleat's minimal cushioning and durability questions.

Support: Cleats Report argued the cleats justify their cost for speed-focused players, whilst ShoesTrace called the premium cost a barrier; FootballRS offered a middling score on value.

Accelerating downfield
Accelerating downfield

Durability

Durability drew the lowest average across reviews. Two reviewers reported concerns about thin material, particularly at the toe box, and potential accelerated wear on abrasive surfaces, while another reviewer reported no stitching failures during their testing period.

Support: ShoesTrace warned they 'may show wear faster on rough surfaces,' Hunter Reynolds described the toe material as 'very very thin,' and Cleats Report noted seams and stitching held up in their testing.

Frequently asked questions

Do they run true to size?

Yes. Multiple reviewers report the Adizero Electric+ II runs true to size for most players, though one reviewer chose to size down and others described a snug fit, so individual preference matters.

Are the studs molded or detachable?

The soleplate is a performance TPU plate with shaped studs intended for firm ground/multi-ground use; the design and reviewer experience point to molded, multi-ground performance rather than a detachable-stud system.

Are these cleats lightweight?

Reviewers consistently describe the cleats as very light and designed for acceleration and quick cuts; weight is 221 g per shoe, which places them firmly in the low-cut speed category.

Are they good on natural grass and turf?

Review evidence points to good traction on firm surfaces but mixed durability: traction is repeatedly praised, while reviewers warned the thin upper and toe area can show wear faster on abrasive surfaces.

What position are the adidas Adizero Electric+ II best for?

The Adizero Electric+ II is best for speed skill positions: wide receivers, cornerbacks, running backs and safeties. Its low-cut, lightweight design and the traction-focused plate suit players prioritising acceleration and sharp cuts rather than heavy ankle support.

Which players wear the adidas Adizero Electric+ II?

The Adidas adidas Adizero Electric+ II is built for players who rely on speed (wide receivers, defensive backs, running backs).

Bottom line, A purpose-built, low-cut speed cleat: excellent for receivers, defensive backs and running backs who prioritise acceleration and grip, but not for players who need heavy cushioning, maximal support or long-term durability on abrasive surfaces.

The breakdown

02 / RATINGS
8.5
TractionStrong consensus · 4 sources
See the evidence
ShoesTrace9.0
Exceptional grip that boosts confidence on quick maneuvers.
FootballRS8.0
the grip, it’s absolutely insane.
8.5
WeightStrong consensus · 4 sources
See the evidence
ShoesTrace8.0
Lightweight construction for faster movement.
FootballRS9.0
These cleats are ridiculously light, Adidas is still the king when it comes to lightweight football cleats.
7.9
LockdownStrong consensus · 4 sources
See the evidence
ShoesTrace8.0
Secure fit with exceptional lockdown for agility.
FootballRS7.0
The molded synthetic heel cup wrapped around my foot beautifully, giving me a secure, locked-in sensation
6.8
FitStrong consensus · 4 sources
See the evidence
ShoesTrace6.0
Yes, the Adizero Electric II runs true to size for most players.
FootballRS8.0
I decided to size down slightly, from my usual 12.5 to a 12, and they fit perfectly.
6.8
SupportStrong consensus · 4 sources
See the evidence
ShoesTrace7.0
provide the traction and support needed for peak performance on the field
FootballRS4.0
the upper is so thin and minimal that it doesn’t give you much in the way of foot support.
6.0
ComfortStrong consensus · 4 sources
See the evidence
ShoesTrace5.0
These cleats are specifically engineered for on-field performance rather than all-day comfort, with a focus on speed and responsiveness over cushioning.
FootballRS5.0
after that two-hour mark, the lack of cushioning really starts to take a toll.
5.5
ValueStrong consensus · 3 sources
See the evidence
ShoesTrace4.0
Premium cost may be a barrier for some athletes.
FootballRS6.0
And while $130 is a solid price for what you’re getting, elite traction, extreme lightness, and tons of color options,
5.1
DurabilityStrong consensus · 3 sources
See the evidence
ShoesTrace4.0
May show wear faster on rough surfaces.
Cleats Report7.0
The seams and stitching held up well to repeated use, with no loose threads or separation during my testing period.

The sources

03 / EVIDENCE

The Cleats Hub Score is a weighted aggregate of these independent reviews, normalised to 0–10 and weighted by source authority, recency and sample size. We don't sell or physically test products. Read the full methodology.

The verdict, split

04 / PROS & CONS

◤ What reviewers love

  • +Very light for acceleration
  • +Strong grip for sharp cuts
  • +Secure heel lockdown
  • +Low-cut speed profile

◢ Where it falls short

  • Minimal long-run cushioning
  • Thin upper limits support
  • Durability concerns on rough surfaces
  • Premium price may deter some

How it stacks up

05 / COMPARE

Put the adidas Adizero Electric+ II head-to-head against another cleat on every aggregated characteristic.

Compare with any product ↗

More cleats to consider

06 / SUGGESTED